mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView
synced 2026-08-11 20:41:44 +00:00
feat(bfld): ADR-291 — wifi-veil emission-shaping countermeasure as advisory dependency
Adds wifi-veil (pinned git rev, dependency-free, MIT/Apache-2.0) to the workspace and gates it behind a new 'veil' feature in wifi-densepose-bfld. The bfld::veil module exposes deterministic attacker-vs-protector shield assessments (re-ID collapse, throughput ratio, energy-conservation audit) with a mandatory SYNTHETIC/L0 evidence label. Advisory only: no RF emission, no frame mutation, BFLD invariants I1-I3 untouched. Default build unchanged; 6 new feature-gated tests pass. Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015TcKegTS7QqhWPC2L2SzaS
This commit is contained in:
Generated
+6
@@ -11365,6 +11365,7 @@ dependencies = [
|
||||
"serde_json",
|
||||
"static_assertions",
|
||||
"thiserror 2.0.18",
|
||||
"wifi-veil",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
[[package]]
|
||||
@@ -11804,6 +11805,11 @@ dependencies = [
|
||||
"wifi-densepose-geo",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
[[package]]
|
||||
name = "wifi-veil"
|
||||
version = "0.1.0"
|
||||
source = "git+https://github.com/ruvnet/wifi-veil?rev=018468b5d2bf41f35c552910f35659830af0eb91#018468b5d2bf41f35c552910f35659830af0eb91"
|
||||
|
||||
[[package]]
|
||||
name = "winapi"
|
||||
version = "0.3.9"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ categories = ["science", "computer-vision", "wasm"]
|
||||
[workspace.dependencies]
|
||||
# Core utilities
|
||||
thiserror = "2.0"
|
||||
# WiFi Veil — compliant-waveform countermeasure against unauthorized WiFi
|
||||
# sensing (ADR-291). Dependency-free, deterministic, SYNTHETIC-only leaf;
|
||||
# pinned to an exact rev because the crate is consumed pre-crates.io-release.
|
||||
wifi-veil = { git = "https://github.com/ruvnet/wifi-veil", rev = "018468b5d2bf41f35c552910f35659830af0eb91" }
|
||||
anyhow = "1.0"
|
||||
serde = { version = "1.0", features = ["derive"] }
|
||||
serde_json = "1.0"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ mqtt = ["std", "dep:rumqttc"]
|
||||
# enables privacy_class = 1 (derived) mode and the SoulMatchOracle gate
|
||||
# exemption. Disabled by default per the structural class-2 default.
|
||||
soul-signature = []
|
||||
# WiFi Veil advisory integration (ADR-291): deterministic attacker-vs-
|
||||
# protector assessment of BFI identity leakage and emission-shaping shield
|
||||
# configs. All numbers it produces are SYNTHETIC / L0 by construction.
|
||||
veil = ["std", "dep:wifi-veil"]
|
||||
|
||||
[dependencies]
|
||||
thiserror.workspace = true
|
||||
@@ -36,6 +40,7 @@ serde_json = { workspace = true, optional = true }
|
||||
# MQTT publisher backend (optional). Matches the `rumqttc` choice already in
|
||||
# `wifi-densepose-sensing-server` so both crates share TLS / version posture.
|
||||
rumqttc = { version = "0.24", default-features = false, features = ["use-rustls"], optional = true }
|
||||
wifi-veil = { workspace = true, optional = true }
|
||||
|
||||
[dev-dependencies]
|
||||
proptest.workspace = true
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ pub mod signature_hasher;
|
||||
pub mod sink;
|
||||
pub mod soul_channels;
|
||||
pub mod soul_match;
|
||||
/// WiFi Veil advisory integration (ADR-291). Feature-gated: `veil`.
|
||||
#[cfg(feature = "veil")]
|
||||
pub mod veil;
|
||||
|
||||
pub use coherence_gate::{CoherenceGate, MatchOutcome, NullOracle, SoulMatchOracle};
|
||||
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
|
||||
//! WiFi Veil advisory integration (ADR-291).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Bridges BFLD's privacy layer to the [`wifi-veil`](https://github.com/ruvnet/wifi-veil)
|
||||
//! countermeasure crate: a deterministic, dependency-free attacker-vs-protector
|
||||
//! model of BFI identity leakage and keyed emission-shaping ("shield")
|
||||
//! configurations.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! # Evidence discipline
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Everything this module produces is **`SYNTHETIC` / evidence level L0** by
|
||||
//! construction: `wifi-veil` models compliant waveform controls on synthetic
|
||||
//! scenes and never touches a radio. Assessments quantify the *modeled*
|
||||
//! re-identification risk of unprotected beamforming feedback and the *modeled*
|
||||
//! effect of a shield; they are advisory inputs to privacy posture, never
|
||||
//! measured hardware claims. See ADR-291 and the wifi-veil README.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! # Relationship to BFLD invariants
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! BFLD's structural invariants (I1–I3, see the crate README) govern data that
|
||||
//! *enters* this node. WiFi Veil addresses the complementary surface: what this
|
||||
//! node's own *outgoing* feedback leaks to passive third parties. The
|
||||
//! integration is advisory-only — nothing here emits RF, alters frames, or
|
||||
//! relaxes a BFLD gate.
|
||||
|
||||
use wifi_veil::{experiment, ExperimentConfig};
|
||||
|
||||
/// Evidence label attached to every veil-derived figure.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Matches the repository-wide claim taxonomy (CLAUDE.md): synthetic model
|
||||
/// output, reproduced by `cargo test`, not measured on hardware.
|
||||
pub const VEIL_EVIDENCE: &str = "SYNTHETIC/L0";
|
||||
|
||||
/// Summary of one deterministic attacker-vs-protector experiment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A thin, stable projection of [`wifi_veil::ExperimentReport`] carrying only
|
||||
/// the figures BFLD consumers need, plus the mandatory evidence label.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub struct ShieldAssessment {
|
||||
/// Number of candidate identities in the synthetic scene.
|
||||
pub identities: usize,
|
||||
/// Ideal chance-level re-identification accuracy (`1 / identities`).
|
||||
pub chance_level: f32,
|
||||
/// Modeled passive re-identification accuracy with the shield **off**.
|
||||
pub reid_accuracy_off: f32,
|
||||
/// Modeled passive re-identification accuracy with the shield **on**.
|
||||
pub reid_accuracy_on: f32,
|
||||
/// Modeled protected-link throughput as a fraction of baseline.
|
||||
pub throughput_ratio: f64,
|
||||
/// `output_energy / input_energy` of a representative protected frame.
|
||||
/// ~1.0 means the control is energy-preserving (compliant, not jamming).
|
||||
pub energy_ratio: f32,
|
||||
/// True iff the energy ratio is within tolerance of 1.0.
|
||||
pub energy_conserving: bool,
|
||||
/// True iff the shield drove re-identification into the accepted
|
||||
/// chance band.
|
||||
pub drives_to_chance: bool,
|
||||
/// Evidence label; always [`VEIL_EVIDENCE`].
|
||||
pub evidence: &'static str,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl ShieldAssessment {
|
||||
/// Residual re-identification margin above chance with the shield on.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// `0.0` (or below) means the modeled attacker is at or below chance;
|
||||
/// larger values mean residual identity leakage in the model.
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn residual_reid_margin(&self) -> f32 {
|
||||
self.reid_accuracy_on - self.chance_level
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// One-line human-readable summary, evidence-tagged.
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn summary(&self) -> String {
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"[{}] re-ID {:.1}% -> {:.1}% (chance {:.1}%, {} identities), \
|
||||
throughput {:.1}%, energy ratio {:.6} ({})",
|
||||
self.evidence,
|
||||
self.reid_accuracy_off * 100.0,
|
||||
self.reid_accuracy_on * 100.0,
|
||||
self.chance_level * 100.0,
|
||||
self.identities,
|
||||
self.throughput_ratio * 100.0,
|
||||
self.energy_ratio,
|
||||
if self.energy_conserving {
|
||||
"energy-conserving"
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
"NOT energy-conserving"
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl From<wifi_veil::ExperimentReport> for ShieldAssessment {
|
||||
fn from(r: wifi_veil::ExperimentReport) -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
identities: r.identities,
|
||||
chance_level: r.chance_level,
|
||||
reid_accuracy_off: r.accuracy_shield_off,
|
||||
reid_accuracy_on: r.accuracy_shield_on,
|
||||
throughput_ratio: r.throughput_ratio,
|
||||
energy_ratio: r.compliance.energy_ratio,
|
||||
energy_conserving: r.compliance.energy_conserving,
|
||||
drives_to_chance: r.drives_to_chance(),
|
||||
evidence: VEIL_EVIDENCE,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Run the deterministic attacker-vs-protector experiment for `cfg`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Fully deterministic: identical configs produce identical assessments.
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn assess(cfg: &ExperimentConfig) -> ShieldAssessment {
|
||||
experiment::run(cfg).into()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Run the experiment with wifi-veil's shipped default scene and shield.
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn assess_default() -> ShieldAssessment {
|
||||
assess(&ExperimentConfig::default())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Derive the optimizer-shipped shield configuration and its verifying
|
||||
/// assessment for `base`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Wraps [`wifi_veil::hyper_optimize`]: the returned shield uses the
|
||||
/// spec-allowed throughput-optimal feedback resolution and a Givens-pass
|
||||
/// count grown by the privacy margin factor.
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn optimized_shield(base: &ExperimentConfig) -> (wifi_veil::ShieldConfig, ShieldAssessment) {
|
||||
let hyper = wifi_veil::hyper_optimize(base);
|
||||
let assessment = hyper.report.into();
|
||||
(hyper.shield, assessment)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod tests {
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn default_assessment_is_deterministic() {
|
||||
let a = assess_default();
|
||||
let b = assess_default();
|
||||
assert_eq!(a, b);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn shield_reduces_modeled_reid_accuracy() {
|
||||
let a = assess_default();
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
a.reid_accuracy_on < a.reid_accuracy_off,
|
||||
"shield-on accuracy {} must be below shield-off {}",
|
||||
a.reid_accuracy_on,
|
||||
a.reid_accuracy_off
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn default_shield_is_compliant_and_at_chance() {
|
||||
let a = assess_default();
|
||||
assert!(a.energy_conserving, "veil must be energy-preserving");
|
||||
assert!(a.drives_to_chance, "shipped default must reach chance band");
|
||||
assert!(a.throughput_ratio > 0.9, "throughput ratio {} too low", a.throughput_ratio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn evidence_label_is_synthetic_l0() {
|
||||
let a = assess_default();
|
||||
assert_eq!(a.evidence, VEIL_EVIDENCE);
|
||||
assert!(a.summary().starts_with("[SYNTHETIC/L0]"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn residual_margin_matches_fields() {
|
||||
let a = assess_default();
|
||||
let m = a.residual_reid_margin();
|
||||
assert!((m - (a.reid_accuracy_on - a.chance_level)).abs() < f32::EPSILON);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn optimized_shield_verifies() {
|
||||
let (shield, assessment) = optimized_shield(&ExperimentConfig::default());
|
||||
assert!(shield.enabled);
|
||||
assert!(assessment.drives_to_chance);
|
||||
assert!(assessment.energy_conserving);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user