mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView
synced 2026-08-02 19:11:46 +00:00
docs(ADR-163): edge-latency RESULTS + PROOF/prove.sh wiring (T3)
Adds benchmarks/edge-latency/RESULTS.md (wiflow-std RESULTS style: each measured number with reproduce command, machine, MEASURED-on-host grade, and the honest host-vs-ESP32 / steady-state-vs-cold-start caveats) and ADR-163 (HEADLINE: CLAIMED latency budgets -> MEASURED-on-host, closing M5/M6 measurement debt; ESP32-on-hardware still pending). - ADR-160 deferred 'criterion benches for process_frame budget claims' line updated to DONE (host) with the ESP32-pending note. - PROOF.md performance table gains the two edge-latency reproduce rows; provenance ADR range extended to ADR-163. - prove.sh gated section gains the edge-latency bench note (host proxy only; not asserted, never claims the ESP32 figure). Benches/docs only; no crate republishes. Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ trained checkpoint) so you can reproduce them yourself.
|
||||
| zero-copy ORT input ~1.48× (ADR-155) | **MEASURED** | `cd v2 && cargo bench -p wifi-densepose-nn --features onnx --bench onnx_bench` |
|
||||
| pointcloud splats 9→2 passes ~1.24× (ADR-160 research) | **MEASURED** | `cd v2 && cargo bench -p wifi-densepose-pointcloud --bench splats_bench` |
|
||||
| native wlanapi multi-BSSID scan 9.74 Hz (vs netsh ~2 Hz) | **MEASURED (Windows)** | `cd v2 && cargo test -p wifi-densepose-wifiscan -- --ignored measure_native_scan_rate` |
|
||||
| wasm-edge `process_frame` hot-path latency (host proxy, ADR-163) | **MEASURED-on-host** (NOT the ESP32/WASM3 budget — needs hardware) | `cd v2/crates/wifi-densepose-wasm-edge && cargo bench --features std` |
|
||||
| cog steady-state CPU infer latency ~305 µs (ADR-163; NOT the manifest cold-start) | **MEASURED-on-host** | `cd v2 && cargo bench -p cog-person-count -p cog-pose-estimation --no-default-features --bench infer_bench` |
|
||||
|
||||
## What we do NOT claim (the honest negatives — the strongest anti-slop signal)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -68,8 +70,9 @@ trained checkpoint) so you can reproduce them yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
## Provenance
|
||||
|
||||
Every claim above traces to a committed ADR (`docs/adr/ADR-154`…`ADR-160`), a
|
||||
test, a criterion bench, or `benchmarks/wiflow-std/RESULTS.md`. The history
|
||||
Every claim above traces to a committed ADR (`docs/adr/ADR-154`…`ADR-163`), a
|
||||
test, a criterion bench, `benchmarks/wiflow-std/RESULTS.md`, or
|
||||
`benchmarks/edge-latency/RESULTS.md`. The history
|
||||
includes published **retractions** (the 92.9% PCK retraction; the WiFlow-STD
|
||||
shipped-checkpoint refutation; the NV-diamond BOM reality check) — a faker hides
|
||||
failures; we commit them.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user