docs(adr): deep review of the RuView npm surface — ADR-263/264/265 optimization strategies

ADR-263 — @ruvnet/ruview@0.1.0 harness review (O1–O9):
- HIGH: claim-check CLI fails open on empty input (no --text/--file -> PASS exit 0)
- HIGH: MCP stdio server head-of-line blocking (spawnSync verify/calibrate up to 600s)
- MEASURED: optionalDependencies triple the cold npx install (4 pkgs/620kB/71 files
  vs 1 pkg/172kB/22 files with --omit=optional) for a path that never imports them
- maxBuffer truncation, python -c port interpolation, version drift, duplicate skills,
  guardrail METRIC_TERMS substring false positives ('map'/'F1' — found by dogfooding
  claim-check on these very ADRs), zero CI

ADR-264 — @ruvnet/rvagent@0.1.0 + @ruv/ruview-cli review (O1–O9), verified against
the published registry tarball:
- HIGH: exports.require -> dist/index.cjs which is never built nor published
- MEASURED: 44 dead source-map files = 62,698B of the 188kB unpacked payload
- stdio-only server described as dual-transport; mixed dot/underscore tool names;
  double Zod validation + hand-duplicated advertised schemas; 2-fd leak per training
  job; unbounded body in the unwired HTTP scaffold; dead detectCogBinary candidates;
  ruview bin-name collision

ADR-265 — cross-cutting npm distribution strategy: npm-packages.yml CI matrix
(test + pack-content/size gate + tarball-install smoke test), publish-from-CI-only
with npm provenance, version single-sourcing from package.json, bin/namespace
ownership (ruview bin belongs to @ruvnet/ruview), claim-check on package READMEs.

Docs only — no runtime code changed. Index/CHANGELOG/CLAUDE.md/README counts updated.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WrGfTGKv1oWZ6iwXZACULz
This commit is contained in:
Claude
2026-07-02 12:35:03 +00:00
parent 1a0492992f
commit 630cd52579
7 changed files with 495 additions and 3 deletions
+4 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Architecture Decision Records
This folder contains 45 Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that document every significant technical choice in the RuView / WiFi-DensePose project.
This folder contains 182 Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that document every significant technical choice in the RuView / WiFi-DensePose project. (The index tables below list a curated subset per domain; see the directory listing for the full set.)
## Why ADRs?
@@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ Statuses: **Proposed** (under discussion), **Accepted** (approved and/or impleme
| [ADR-097](ADR-097-adopt-rvcsi-as-ruview-csi-runtime.md) | Adopt rvCSI as RuView's primary CSI runtime (phased adoption) | Proposed |
| [ADR-098](ADR-098-evaluate-midstream-fit.md) | Evaluate `ruvnet/midstream` for RuView's CSI / WebSocket / mesh pipeline | Rejected |
| [ADR-099](ADR-099-midstream-introspection-tap.md) | Adopt midstream as RuView's real-time introspection + low-latency tap | Proposed |
| [ADR-263](ADR-263-ruview-npm-harness-deep-review.md) | `@ruvnet/ruview` npm harness — deep review + optimization strategy | Proposed |
| [ADR-264](ADR-264-rvagent-mcp-and-cli-npm-deep-review.md) | `@ruvnet/rvagent` MCP server + `@ruv/ruview-cli` — deep review + optimization strategy | Proposed |
| [ADR-265](ADR-265-ruview-npm-distribution-strategy.md) | RuView npm distribution strategy — CI gate, provenance, version single-sourcing, namespace | Proposed |
---