Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dragan Spiridonov 347698b67c feat(auth): browser sign-in — /oauth/start, /oauth/callback, session cookie
Closes the gap adversarial review found: `wifi-densepose login` writes
~/.ruview/credentials.json, which a BROWSER CANNOT READ. The UI therefore had no
way to obtain a Cognitum token at all, and the WebSocket ticket mechanism
ADR-272 built "for browsers" was only exercisable with the legacy static shared
secret OAuth was meant to replace. The ADRs described a browser story that did
not exist.

Ported from cognitum-one/freetokens (src/auth/oauth.ts, live at
freetokens.cognitum.one), whose shape is not the obvious one and is the whole
point:

  THE BROWSER NEVER HOLDS AN OAUTH TOKEN.

The server generates the PKCE verifier and state, keeps them in an HMAC-signed
cookie, performs the code exchange itself, verifies the token, and issues its
OWN session cookie carrying an assertion — subject, account, scope, expiry — not
a credential. So the access token cannot be read by an XSS, cannot sit in
localStorage, and cannot leak through a URL. A stolen session cookie is useless
against Cognitum or any sibling service.

  GET /oauth/start    -> 302 to auth.cognitum.one + signed transaction cookie
  GET /oauth/callback -> constant-time state check, exchange, verify, session
  GET /oauth/logout   -> clears the local session (not the Cognitum session)

Verified against the running binary: /oauth/start returns the same 302 +
HttpOnly/SameSite=Lax/Max-Age=600 shape freetokens does live; a forged `state`
is refused 400; a forged session cookie is refused 401.

DELIBERATE DEVIATION from freetokens: no `__Host-` cookie prefix. That prefix
REQUIRES `Secure`, and RuView is routinely reached at http://localhost or over
plain HTTP on a LAN, where such a cookie is never sent and sign-in would fail
silently. `Secure` is set only when the request actually arrived over TLS
(direct or via x-forwarded-proto). Every other attribute matches; the HMAC is
what protects the value.

Other decisions worth stating:
- The callback verifies through the SAME `verify_access_token` every other
  request uses — signature, audience (client_id), typ, expiry, scope. A sign-in
  path must not be a softer path.
- The session cookie is checked LAST in the middleware, after bearer and ticket:
  it is the weakest-bound credential, so a presented bearer should win.
- A browser session requests `sensing:read` only. Admin work goes through the
  CLI's explicit `--admin`.
- The token exchange runs in `spawn_blocking` — `ureq` is blocking, and parking
  an async worker is the mistake this codebase just had to fix in jwks.rs.
- `/oauth/*` sits outside `/api/v1/*` on purpose: gating the routes you use to
  obtain a credential would deadlock.

PKCE moved out from behind the `login` feature into its own light `pkce` feature
(rand + sha2 + base64, no HTTP stack), so the server can build an authorize URL
without pulling in the client-side login machinery. `login` now implies `pkce`.

Tests: 13 new browser_session unit tests — signature round-trip, tampered
payload, wrong secret, malformed cookie values, HttpOnly/SameSite/Secure
attributes, exact scope matching with no implied escalation, a cookie name that
merely ends with the target not matching, multi-scope URL encoding, and the
core property that a session cookie never contains the access token.
Totals: 547 sensing-server lib + 5 wiring integration, 87 ruview-auth.

Co-Authored-By: Ruflo & AQE
2026-07-23 09:57:15 +02:00
Dragan Spiridonov 0547fd7344 fix(auth): enforce client_id as the audience — Cognitum's stand-in for aud
Found by reading cognitum-one/freetokens, a live sibling service whose browser
OAuth landed while this PR was open. Its integration contract states the
platform rule outright:

  "Cognitum access tokens intentionally use custom `client_id` rather than a
   registered JWT `aud` claim."  -- freetokens docs/AUTH_INTEGRATION.md

and `src/auth/oauth.ts` enforces it on every sign-in:

  payload.client_id !== config.OAUTH_CLIENT_ID  -> reject

RuView did not. An earlier revision here removed the `client_id` check and kept
it only for logging, reasoning that clients borrow one another's registrations
(musica shipped as `meta-proxy` while its own was pending) and that scope alone
must therefore carry the boundary. That reasoned from a TRANSITIONAL state:
RuView has its own registered client (identity migration 0017), and the platform
does have an audience mechanism — it is simply spelled `client_id`.

Consequence of the old behaviour: a Cognitum access token minted for ANY product
— meta-proxy, musica, metaharness, freetokens — was accepted by a RuView server
provided it carried a sensing scope. Scope was the only thing standing between
another product's token and this one. Now there are two boundaries, audience and
capability, which is what the platform intends.

- `VerifierConfig.allowed_client_ids`; empty = accept any (explicit opt-out).
- `RUVIEW_OAUTH_CLIENT_IDS` env, default `ruview`, `*` to disable with a loud
  warning naming what is being given up. Comma-separated for the migration case
  where a borrowed registration must be accepted alongside our own.
- New `VerifyError::WrongAudience`, checked BEFORE scope, so the failure names
  the real reason rather than blaming the scope.

The existing cross-product test now asserts `WrongAudience` rather than
`MissingScope` — the token is refused for the stronger reason. Three new tests:
a correctly-scoped token from another product is still refused; the empty-list
opt-out accepts anything (pinned so it stays deliberate); multiple allowed
clients work.

This also corrects the module docs and ADR-271, which claimed "scope is the ONLY
capability boundary" — true of the code as written, but not of the platform.

Tests: 85 ruview-auth, 533 sensing-server.

Co-Authored-By: Ruflo & AQE
2026-07-23 09:31:24 +02:00
Dragan Spiridonov f67a880a1a docs: correct three doc-vs-code contradictions found by adversarial review
All three are my own drift — the exact failure this session criticised in other
repos' ADRs and then reproduced.

1. ADR-271 §2 still listed "`iss` matches the configured issuer verbatim" in the
   accept-rule. That rule was removed from the code in 12635a85 because Cognitum
   issues no `iss` and it rejected every real token. The ADR's own "Facts about
   the tokens" section 30 lines above already said tokens carry no `iss` — the
   document contradicted itself for a day. Also removed a claim that tests cover
   "issuer mismatch including a trailing-slash-only difference"; that test was
   deleted with the rule and no longer exists.

2. `ruview-auth/src/lib.rs:59` said "**No login flow.** ... this crate only
   verifies" — 15 lines above `pub mod login;`. Now states the accurate thing:
   the login flow is behind the non-default `login` feature, so a verifying
   server never compiles it.

3. ADR-271's scope table still described the old prefix-denylist admin set.
   Replaced with the fail-closed rule that actually ships, including why:
   `/api/v1/adaptive/train` was reachable with `sensing:read`.

Also records a KNOWN INCOMPLETE that the ADRs previously implied was done: the
browser cannot obtain an OAuth token at all. `wifi-densepose login` writes
~/.ruview/credentials.json, which a browser cannot read; the UI reads
localStorage['ruview-api-token'], populated only by the manual-paste
QuickSettings panel. `grep -ril "oauth|cognitum|pkce" ui/` returns nothing.

So the WebSocket ticket mechanism ADR-272 introduces "for browsers" is today
only exercisable with the legacy static shared secret OAuth was meant to
replace. Server-side gating is correct and complete; the browser half of the
story these ADRs tell is not built. Recorded rather than left implied.

Co-Authored-By: Ruflo & AQE
2026-07-23 09:20:31 +02:00
Dragan Spiridonov 31fb3d53f6 feat(cli): wifi-densepose login — Cognitum sign-in (ADR-271 phase 2)
Phase 1 could verify a token and phase 3 could gate on one, but there was no
way for a user to OBTAIN one. This closes that: sign in with a Cognitum account
and get a token a RuView sensing server accepts, instead of everyone sharing
one static RUVIEW_API_TOKEN string.

Lives in `ruview-auth` behind a non-default `login` feature rather than in the
CLI, so the Tauri desktop app can reuse it instead of growing a second copy.
A server built with default features still gets the verifier and nothing else —
no reqwest, no tokio net, no browser launcher. (This amends ADR-271's "no login
flow in this crate" note; the reason for that line was to keep the server lean,
and a feature gate achieves it without duplication.)

Ported from meta-proxy's src/oauth/, cross-checked against musica's
cognitum_provider.rs — two independent implementations against this same AS.
Where they agree, this follows both: redirect path EXACTLY /oauth/callback,
60-second refresh skew, OOB fallback on SSH/CONTAINER//.dockerenv.

Refresh is the part with teeth. Identity rotates refresh tokens with reuse
detection, so presenting a spent one revokes the whole session family. Both
obvious implementations are wrong: refreshing concurrently looks like replay,
and retrying a failed refresh with the same token IS the replay. So
`Session::ensure_fresh` holds an async mutex across the await, re-checks expiry
after acquiring it (the waiter usually finds the work already done), persists
the rotated token BEFORE returning it, and never retries. A missing expires_at
counts as expired rather than being given a guessed default.

Least scope by default: `login` requests `sensing:read`. `--admin` adds
`sensing:admin` explicitly, and requests both because there is no scope
hierarchy server-side. A session that streams poses should not casually hold
the capability to delete the model it streams through.

Credentials are written atomically and 0600 (temp file, chmod BEFORE rename) —
the same discipline the seed applies to its cloud key. `logout` is local-only
and says so: it makes this machine unable to act as you, but revoking the
session everywhere is an account-level action.

Also `whoami`, which reports whether the stored token is live — an
expired-looking session is the most common reason a command starts 401ing, and
it should be visible directly rather than inferred from a failure elsewhere.

Verified against PRODUCTION, not just locally: authorize URLs built by this
exact code path return HTTP 200 from auth.cognitum.one for both
`sensing:read` and `sensing:read sensing:admin`, which exercises the real
client_id, scope encoding, PKCE parameters and redirect_uri shape.

Tests: 74 with --features login (51 unit + 21 verifier matrix + 2 doctests),
including the RFC 7636 Appendix B vector, multi-scope URL encoding (a space
that is hand-formatted rather than encoded silently truncates the request), a
real TCP callback round-trip, callback timeout, 0600 permissions asserted on
disk, atomic-save leaving no temp file, and refresh-window boundaries.
Unchanged: 43 with default features, 501 in the sensing server.

Co-Authored-By: Ruflo & AQE
2026-07-22 17:53:42 +02:00
Dragan Spiridonov 499cec7914 feat(auth): ruview-auth — offline Cognitum OAuth access-token verification (ADR-271)
RuView's `/api/v1/*` is gated today by `RUVIEW_API_TOKEN`: one shared secret,
no expiry, no per-user attribution. This adds the verifier half of replacing
that with Cognitum identity — RuView as an OAuth **resource server**, so a user
signs in to their own sensing server with their Cognitum account.

Note the direction: RuView does not call Cognitum. It never obtains a token for
its own use; it verifies tokens users present. Every other Cognitum OAuth
integration in the org (meta-proxy, musica, metaharness, the dashboard CLI) is
the client side of a plane RuView doesn't have. The one existing resource-server
verifier is `meta-llm/src/auth/oauthBearer.ts`, and this crate is a port of its
accept-rule — divergence would be a bug, not a preference: a token meta-llm
rejects must not be one RuView accepts.

Verification is OFFLINE, and that is a requirement rather than an optimisation.
RuView runs on Pi-class hardware that loses WAN, and identity publishes no
introspection endpoint even when the network is up. So: ES256 over identity's
published JWKS, cached by `kid`.

What it accepts, mirroring oauthBearer.ts:
  typ == "access" AND NOT setup AND NOT workload AND account_id non-empty AND
  exp in the future AND iss matches verbatim AND the required scope is held.

Long-lived setup (365-day) and workload credentials are refused outright for
identity's own stated reason: their revocation lives in `oauth_setup_tokens`,
and RuView — like meta-llm — has no database to check it. A 15-minute access
token needs no revocation round-trip because it expires faster than revocation
propagates; a 365-day one does.

Scope is the capability boundary, and it has to be. Cognitum access tokens carry
no `aud`, and `client_id` cannot substitute because clients borrow each other's
registrations (musica ships DEFAULT_CLIENT_ID = "meta-proxy"). `sensing:read`
covers streams and inference; `sensing:admin` covers training, model delete and
recording delete. No hierarchy — admin does not imply read; consent means what
it said. Registered in identity migration 0016 (cognitum-one/dashboard#116).

Design notes:
- `ureq`, not `reqwest`: the sensing server deliberately chose ureq as "the
  smallest" HTTP client, and pulling reqwest in here would reverse that for the
  whole graph. Transport sits behind a `JwksFetcher` trait, so a host can supply
  its own and take no HTTP dependency at all (feature `ureq-transport`, default).
- A JWKS refetch failure is survivable while a key set is already cached: a key
  that verified a minute ago has not stopped being valid because the network
  blipped, and failing closed there logs every user out of their own sensing
  server whenever their internet wobbles. We fail closed in exactly one case —
  no key set has ever been fetched.
- Unknown `kid` forces one refetch so rotation is picked up without waiting out
  the TTL, rate-limited so junk-kid tokens can't become a request amplifier
  aimed at identity.
- Expiry is reported distinctly from a bad signature: on an RTC-less Pi that is
  usually a clock-sync fault, and an operator must be able to tell them apart.
- Test keypairs are generated at runtime, never committed. This repo tracks zero
  `.pem` files and committed key material shouldn't start here — it also means
  no fixture can drift out of sync with the JWKS it's served by.

Tests: 41 green (19 unit + 21 matrix + 1 doctest) under BOTH
`cargo test --no-default-features` (the repo's canonical gate) and default
features. The matrix signs real ES256 tokens rather than asserting on strings,
and covers alg:none, forged signature, spliced payload, unknown kid, expired,
leeway boundaries both sides, wrong issuer, issuer differing only by a trailing
slash, missing/!=access typ, setup and workload smuggled onto typ=access,
missing and empty account_id, and scope escalation.

The highest-value case is `g2_a_genuinely_valid_token_from_another_cognitum_
product_cannot_reach_the_sensing_surface`: a correctly signed, unexpired,
right-issuer, right-typ token with client_id=meta-proxy and scope=inference is
rejected. Nothing about its signature or identity claims distinguishes it — only
scope does. A naive verifier accepts it, and an `inference` token becomes a key
to someone's home sensor.

No wiring into the sensing server yet; this crate is verification only, with no
login flow and no outbound Cognitum calls.

Co-Authored-By: Ruflo & AQE
2026-07-22 15:08:40 +02:00