70696bbc68
feat(train): compact WiFlow-STD presets in Rust + tiny edge artifact (ADR-152)
...
WiFlowStdConfig gains half()/quarter()/tiny() mirroring the overnight sweep
exactly: TcnGroupsMode (Fixed/Gcd/Depthwise), input_pw_groups, derived
stride schedule and decoder-mid (all default to upstream behavior; legacy
serde JSON unaffected). Param formulas pin to trained ground truth first
try: 843,834 / 338,600 / 56,290; default 2,225,042 pin and 1.192e-7 parity
unchanged. 248 tests green.
Tiny edge artifact (tiny_edge_bench.py): ONNX fp32 = 295 KB, 0.66 ms/win
(~1,500/s CPU), 94.11% PCK@20 (matches sweep clean-test exactly; parity
1.49e-7). Static int8 is a bad trade at this scale (-1.43pt, +19% MPJPE,
-16% size, slower) — recorded as negative result. Export note: width-16
breaks AdaptiveAvgPool((15,1)) TorchScript export; replaced by exact
mean+matmul equivalent, proven by parity.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-11 10:14:53 -04:00
22f603d81f
feat(benchmarks): efficiency sweep MEASURED — half model dominates full reference
...
Compact WiFlow-STD variants on the same data/split/protocol: half (843,834
params, 0.38x) strictly dominates the 2.23M reference (PCK@20 96.62 vs
96.61, PCK@50 99.47 vs 99.11, MPJPE 0.00898 vs 0.0094) — the published
architecture is over-parameterized for its own benchmark. quarter (338k)
96.05%; tiny (56,290 params, 1/39.5) holds 94.11% — a ~220KB fp32 edge
candidate. In-domain caveats recorded; cross-domain untested.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-11 00:41:05 -04:00
fc4a8652ee
feat(benchmarks): measurement (b) MEASURED — optimization transfer only, mean-pose baseline wins
...
WiFlow-STD fine-tuned on 2,046 fresh single-room ESP32 paired windows
(temporal 70/15/15, 70->540 adapter, K=17): pretrained-init 65% PCK@20 vs
scratch 0% (optimization transfer) but frozen-trunk ~0% (no feature
transfer), and NOTHING beats the mean-pose baseline (95.9% PCK@20 —
single subject, near-static normalized coords). Honesty gates held: pred
std 0.0113 (non-constant model) but mean-baseline dominance means no
citable CSI->pose capability from this data. ADR-152 open question 1
answered partially; definitive answer needs multi-subject/position data.
Two new aligner findings: heterogeneous csi_shape with silent zero-padding
(~20%), and extractCsiMatrix's transposed shape label (frame-major data,
[nSc, nFrames] label) — fixes pending.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-10 23:14:20 -04:00
575ee4d2eb
feat(benchmarks): static PTQ int8 (calibrated) results + overnight capture script
...
Conv-only static QDQ beats dynamic int8 on accuracy (PCK@20 96.61-96.63%
vs 96.52%, MPJPE +10% vs +18% over fp32) at ~equal size/latency; all-ops
QDQ strictly worse (int8 activations through attention glue). Entropy
calibration verified bit-identical to MinMax on this data. Deployment:
ONNX fp32 for speed (3.2ms), static conv-only QDQ for smallest (2.53MB).
Also: scripts/overnight-empty-capture.py — segmented UDP CSI recorder for
empty-room baselines (no glob collisions, detach-safe).
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-10 23:04:38 -04:00
42b261f807
feat(benchmarks): edge optimization measured + measurement (b) blocked + 92.9% retraction
...
Edge optimization (ADR-152 optimize track): ONNX Runtime fp32 is the CPU
latency win (3.2 ms/window, ~3.4x faster than torch, parity 2.4e-7); ORT
dynamic int8 reaches 2.44 MB (paper's ~2.2 MB claim plausible only via
conv-capable toolchains; -0.16pt PCK@20, +18% MPJPE, 2x slower); torch
dynamic quant converts 0% of this conv-only model; fp16 halves storage free
but is slower on CPU.
Measurement (b) BLOCKED-ON-DATA: only 1,077 paired ESP32 windows exist
(stop rule <2k). Forensic recheck of the surviving April holdout RETRACTS
the ADR-079 '92.9% PCK@20' figure: constant-output model, absolute (not
torso) threshold, 69 near-static frames — mean predictor scores 100% under
that protocol; torso-PCK@20 is 19.1%. Corroborates PR #535 . Stale citations
removed from user-guide, readme-details, ADR-152 §2.1.3; no-citation rule
extended to ADR-079 accuracy claims. Unblock: >=2k-window multi-pose paired
session + torso-PCK re-baseline.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-10 22:05:39 -04:00
af6621005f
feat(train): WiFlow-STD PyTorch->tch weight import + numerical parity proof
...
export_to_safetensors.py maps the retrained checkpoint (295 tensors -> 248
mapped, param sum exactly 2,225,042; num_batches_tracked dropped) into a
tch-loadable safetensors plus a deterministic parity fixture. Gated #[ignore]
integration test loads it strictly and asserts forward-pass agreement:
max abs diff 1.192e-7 on the seed-42 fixture. dump_variable_names test makes
the tch name layout authoritative. Zero architecture discrepancies found.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-10 20:23:38 -04:00
e1936c9a24
feat(benchmarks): WiFlow-STD reproduction harness + measurement (a) results (ADR-152 §2.2)
...
Shipped checkpoint REFUTED (0.08% PCK@20, wrong keypoint normalization);
6 reproducibility defects documented (broken imports, corrupted dataset
tail with float32-max garbage that NaN-poisons fp16 BatchNorm, unreachable
test phase). After repairs, retraining with upstream defaults reproduces
96.09% PCK@20 full-test / 96.61% corruption-free (published 97.25%) on
RTX 5080. Claims graded MEASURED-EQUIVALENT; 2.23M params + ~0.055 GFLOPs
verified. Third-party code/weights/data stay out of tree (gitignored).
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net >
2026-06-10 18:54:03 -04:00
ruv