 ruv
|
fc4a8652ee
|
feat(benchmarks): measurement (b) MEASURED — optimization transfer only, mean-pose baseline wins
WiFlow-STD fine-tuned on 2,046 fresh single-room ESP32 paired windows
(temporal 70/15/15, 70->540 adapter, K=17): pretrained-init 65% PCK@20 vs
scratch 0% (optimization transfer) but frozen-trunk ~0% (no feature
transfer), and NOTHING beats the mean-pose baseline (95.9% PCK@20 —
single subject, near-static normalized coords). Honesty gates held: pred
std 0.0113 (non-constant model) but mean-baseline dominance means no
citable CSI->pose capability from this data. ADR-152 open question 1
answered partially; definitive answer needs multi-subject/position data.
Two new aligner findings: heterogeneous csi_shape with silent zero-padding
(~20%), and extractCsiMatrix's transposed shape label (frame-major data,
[nSc, nFrames] label) — fixes pending.
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
|
2026-06-10 23:14:20 -04:00 |
|
|
ruv
|
e1936c9a24
|
feat(benchmarks): WiFlow-STD reproduction harness + measurement (a) results (ADR-152 §2.2)
Shipped checkpoint REFUTED (0.08% PCK@20, wrong keypoint normalization);
6 reproducibility defects documented (broken imports, corrupted dataset
tail with float32-max garbage that NaN-poisons fp16 BatchNorm, unreachable
test phase). After repairs, retraining with upstream defaults reproduces
96.09% PCK@20 full-test / 96.61% corruption-free (published 97.25%) on
RTX 5080. Claims graded MEASURED-EQUIVALENT; 2.23M params + ~0.055 GFLOPs
verified. Third-party code/weights/data stay out of tree (gitignored).
Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
|
2026-06-10 18:54:03 -04:00 |
|