mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView
synced 2026-07-22 17:23:19 +00:00
Dragan Spiridonov
12635a85b2
The verifier called `Validation::set_issuer` and listed `iss` in `set_required_spec_claims`. Cognitum access tokens have **no `iss` claim** — the real claim set is typ, sub, account_id, org_id, workspace_id, client_id, scope, family_id, jti, iat, exp, setup, workload. So the verifier rejected every genuine token with a flat 401. The whole 41-test suite was green throughout, because the test fixtures included an `iss` the real thing does not have. The tests validated my assumption instead of the platform. Found only by pointing a real token at a real server; no amount of additional unit testing against the same wrong fixture would have caught it. `valid_claims()` now mirrors production exactly, with a comment saying why, so the next person cannot reintroduce the drift by "fixing" an incomplete-looking fixture. What binds a token to its issuer, then: the JWKS. We accept only signatures made by a key served from the configured jwks_uri, so a valid signature IS proof of issuer. meta-llm's verifier — the org's only other resource-side verifier — checks neither `iss` nor `aud`, for the same reason. `VerifierConfig.issuer` stays, now documented as JWKS-derivation and logging rather than a claim assertion. Three tests replace the two that asserted issuer behaviour that cannot exist: a real-shaped (iss-less) token verifies; an unrelated `iss` changes nothing (so identity adding one later cannot silently start failing tokens); and a token signed by a different key is still refused — the complement that proves removing the issuer check did not remove the boundary. Also: report the granted scope from the token's `scope` claim when the /oauth/token envelope omits it, which identity's does. `login` and `whoami` said "(not reported by the server)" while the authoritative answer sat inside the token they had just stored. The claim-peek helper is display-only and documented at length as NOT verification — a client reading its own freshly issued token is a different situation from a server reading a stranger's. VERIFIED END TO END against production (gate G-3, previously open): no credential GET /api/v1/models -> 401 garbage bearer GET /api/v1/models -> 401 real sensing:read token GET /api/v1/models -> 200 real sensing:read token GET /api/v1/recording/list-> 200 real sensing:read token POST /api/v1/train/start -> 401 real sensing:read token POST /api/v1/train/stop -> 401 Token obtained by a human through `wifi-densepose login` against auth.cognitum.one; server ran with RUVIEW_OAUTH_ISSUER set, JWKS fetched live at boot (key_count=1). Tests: 82 with --features login (58 unit + 22 matrix + 2 doctests). Co-Authored-By: Ruflo & AQE