mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView
synced 2026-06-30 13:43:18 +00:00
898aaef053
Decisive result: 50 labeled frames/subject of in-room calibration -> 72.2% (reaches SOTA), 200 -> 76.1%, 1000 -> 78.3%. Few-shot target adaptation dominates source volume (+24 subjects bought +6pt; 200 target frames bought +12.4pt). Re-scopes the deployment story: ship a ~30s on-site calibration, not a mass corpus. Foundation encoder's role shifts to making that calibration cheaper. Supersedes the earlier data-bound pessimism. Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>