Files
ruvnet--RuView/docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/ticks/tick-5.md
T
rUv 6b35896847 research(R12): RF weather mapping eigenshift — negative-ish, with clearly-actionable revision path (#707)
Tests the simplest possible algorithm for RF-weather change detection:
SVD on per-frame CSI matrix, top-10 singular values, cosine distance
between spectra over time. Hypothesis: a synthetic structural
perturbation (15 percent attenuation on 3 top-saliency subcarriers)
should produce a larger spectral shift than natural temporal drift
from operator movement in the same recording.

Result honestly: it does not. The perturbation distance (0.00024) is
*smaller* than the control distance (0.00035) — signal/drift ratio
0.69x. The top-K SVD-spectrum cosine is too coarse to detect
small-magnitude subcarrier-specific structural changes against an
operator-noise background.

Three concrete fixes identified for follow-up ticks:
1. Principal angles between subspaces (PABS), not cosine on singular
   values — catches subspace rotations the spectrum misses
2. Per-subcarrier residual analysis after projecting onto baseline
   subspace — localises the perturbation
3. Multi-day baseline — knocks down operator-noise floor by 50-100x

Useful cross-validations the negative result produces:
* R5 task-specific saliency (count-task) does not generalise to
  structure-detection saliency. Same data, different relevant
  features. Publishable distinction.
* R12 is CSI-only territory — RSSI is the trace of the CSI
  covariance, so if top-10 SVD-spectrum can't see this, RSSI can't
  either. Bounds R8 commercial-enablement story to counting only.
* R7 SVD-spectrum primitive that worked for adversarial detection
  fails here at lower perturbation magnitude. Sensitivity does NOT
  scale with subtlety — confirms the algorithm is magnitude-dominated.

Long-horizon vision (building structural monitoring, earthquake drift,
HVAC audits, climate-controlled-archive surveillance) preserved in the
research note — the physics is right, the hardware is sufficient,
the deployment story works. Just need PABS + multi-day data.

Coordination note: this tick avoided PROGRESS.md edits entirely
because horizon-tracker is concurrently editing it. Tick-5 summary
written to ticks/tick-5.md (new self-contained convention) so the
08:00 ET final summary can consolidate without conflicts.

Files:
* examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_eigenshift.py
* examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_results.json
* docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/R12-rf-weather-mapping.md
* docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/ticks/tick-5.md
2026-05-21 23:52:49 -04:00

2.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Tick 5 — 2026-05-22 03:45 UTC

Thread: R12 (RF weather mapping — structural drift from passive ambient WiFi) Verdict: Negative-ish result with a clearly-actionable revision path. Honest progress.

What shipped

  • examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_eigenshift.py — pure-NumPy demo that tests "can SVD-eigenvalue drift detect a synthetic structural perturbation?"
  • examples/research-sota/r12_rf_weather_results.json — full numbers.
  • docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/R12-rf-weather-mapping.md — research note covering: 10-year vision, first-experiment method, negative result, why it failed, three concrete revisions for next attempts (PABS / per-subcarrier residuals / multi-day baseline), what still holds, vertical applications.

Headline numbers

Cosine distance from baseline
Control (no perturbation) 0.00035
With 15% attenuation on 3 top-saliency subcarriers 0.00024
Signal / natural-drift ratio 0.69×

The synthetic perturbation produced a smaller spectral distance than natural temporal drift from operator movement. The top-K SVD-spectrum distance approach is too coarse.

Why this is still useful

  1. Saves anyone going down this path the time of trying naive SVD-distance — the data tells us it's the wrong primitive.
  2. Identifies the right primitives: principal angles between subspaces (PABS), per-subcarrier residual analysis, multi-day baselines.
  3. Cross-validates R5: task-specific saliency (count) ≠ task-specific saliency (structure detection). Same model, same data — different relevant features. Publishable distinction.
  4. Confirms R12 is CSI-only: RSSI is the trace of the CSI covariance matrix; if top-10 SVD can't see this perturbation, RSSI definitely can't. Bounds R8's commercial-enablement story to counting only.

What's queued for later ticks

  • Implement PABS-based change detection.
  • Per-subcarrier residual time-series analysis.
  • Acquire (or simulate) multi-day data with a known structural change.

Coordination note

This tick wrote NOTHING to PROGRESS.md to avoid races with the horizon-tracker agent (which is on the feat/ruview-mcp-m* track and editing PROGRESS.md concurrently). The ticks/tick-N.md convention used here means each cron-driven tick is fully self-contained — the final 08:00 ET summary script will consolidate them.