Files
ruvnet--RuView/v2/crates/wifi-densepose-rufield/src/privacy.rs
T
rUv f250149e94 feat(ADR-262 P1): wifi-densepose-rufield bridge — RuView sensing → signed RuField FieldEvents (fail-closed privacy map) (#1070)
* feat(rufield): ADR-262 P1 — wifi-densepose-rufield anti-corruption bridge

New v2 workspace member that converts RuView WiFi-CSI sensing output into
signed RuField FieldEvents. Path-deps the vendor/rufield submodule crates
(rufield-core/-provenance/-privacy/-fusion); single coupling point between
RuView and the standalone RuField MFS spec (ADR-262 §5.4).

- SensingSnapshot: owned primitives mirroring SensingUpdate + TrustedOutput
  (no dependency on wifi-densepose-sensing-server).
- snapshot_to_field_event(): builds a WifiCsi FieldTensor + Observation,
  derives a real position from the signal-field peak (never fabricated),
  real sha256 provenance + ed25519 signature (synthetic=false).
- map_privacy() (§3.3 crux): maps by information content, NEVER byte value —
  Derived (byte 1) → P4/P5, never P1; fail-closed demotion floor to P2.

P1 gates (tests/p1_gates.rs): round-trip serde, is_fusable verified receipt,
RuFieldFusion::ingest accept + infer runs, privacy-safety (Derived never P1),
full §3.3 table, fail-closed demotion, determinism, no-fabricated-position.
15 tests pass (5 unit + 9 integration + 1 doc), 0 failed.

Honesty: P1 plumbing (tested conversion + safe privacy mapping), NOT wired
into the live server (P3) and NOT an accuracy claim.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>

* docs(adr-262): mark P1 implemented + CI submodules:recursive + CHANGELOG/CLAUDE

- ADR-262 Status → "Proposed — P1 implemented"; add §0.1 Implementation
  status (the bridge crate + the five P1 gates that pass; defers the
  provenance-carrier reuse, P3 live wiring, and P4 multi-modality).
- ci.yml: add `submodules: recursive` to the rust-tests checkout so the new
  crate's `vendor/rufield` path-deps resolve in CI (they fail otherwise even
  though the workspace build passes locally with the submodule present).
- CHANGELOG [Unreleased]: P1 bridge entry (kept alongside the upstream
  ADR-262 research entry).
- CLAUDE.md: crate table row for `wifi-densepose-rufield`.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-06-14 12:46:58 -04:00

148 lines
6.0 KiB
Rust
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
//! The ADR-262 §3.3 privacy mapping — the critical correctness item.
//!
//! RuView's effective `PrivacyClass` (4 byte-level classes) is the source of
//! truth; the bridge maps it onto RuField's `PrivacyClass` (P0P5) **at the
//! egress boundary, by information content, NEVER by byte value**.
//!
//! ## The trap (ADR-262 §3, §6)
//!
//! RuView's `Derived` has byte value `1`, which sorts *below* `Anonymous`
//! (byte `2`). A naive byte-mapping (`Derived = 1 → P1`) would leak
//! identity-bearing features (`identity_embedding`, `identity_risk_score`) as a
//! **low-privacy P1** event. Because `Derived` carries derived *identity*, it
//! must map to the **biometric/identity tier (P4/P5)** — never P1. This is the
//! single most dangerous mapping mistake; it gets a dedicated test
//! (`derived_identity_never_maps_to_low_privacy`).
//!
//! ## Fail-closed
//!
//! [`RuViewPrivacyClass`] is a closed enum, so there is no runtime "unknown"
//! value to receive — but the mapping is written `match`-exhaustively with an
//! explicit, documented arm per class, and the `demoted`/`identity_bound`
//! overlays only ever move the result **toward more privacy**, never less.
use crate::snapshot::RuViewPrivacyClass;
use rufield_core::PrivacyClass;
/// Map a RuView effective `PrivacyClass` onto a RuField `PrivacyClass`
/// (ADR-262 §3.3), by information content.
///
/// | RuView (byte) | → RuField | Rationale |
/// |---|---|---|
/// | `Raw` (0) | `P0` | raw CSI waveform |
/// | `Derived` (1) | `P4` (or `P5` if `identity_bound`) | derived **identity** features ⇒ biometric/identity tier, **not** P1 |
/// | `Anonymous` (2) | `P2` | occupancy / motion only |
/// | `Restricted` (3) | `P2` (raw suppressed) | matches `suppress_raw_outputs` |
///
/// `identity_bound` only promotes `Derived` (already identity-derived) from P4
/// to P5; it can never lower the class.
#[must_use]
pub fn map_privacy(ruview_class: RuViewPrivacyClass, identity_bound: bool) -> PrivacyClass {
match ruview_class {
// Raw CSI amplitude → raw waveform tier.
RuViewPrivacyClass::Raw => PrivacyClass::P0,
// THE CRITICAL ARM (§3.3 / §6): `Derived` carries identity. Map by
// information content to the biometric/identity tier P4, and to P5 when
// the surface is bound to a named identity. NEVER P1.
RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived => {
if identity_bound {
PrivacyClass::P5
} else {
PrivacyClass::P4
}
}
// Anonymous occupancy / motion aggregate → P2.
RuViewPrivacyClass::Anonymous => PrivacyClass::P2,
// Restricted: occupancy with risk score / hash stripped and raw
// suppressed. Capped at P2 (occupancy tier), matching
// `EngineBridge::suppress_raw_outputs` (`engine_bridge.rs:240`).
RuViewPrivacyClass::Restricted => PrivacyClass::P2,
}
}
/// The §4 P2 gate (b) monotonicity overlay: a governed-engine **demotion**
/// (`TrustedOutput.demoted == true`) must never let the emitted class fall
/// below P2 (occupancy floor), and raw is suppressed.
///
/// This is applied *after* [`map_privacy`] and can only raise the class
/// (toward more privacy) — it is fail-closed by construction.
#[must_use]
pub fn apply_demotion_floor(class: PrivacyClass, demoted: bool) -> PrivacyClass {
if demoted && class < PrivacyClass::P2 {
PrivacyClass::P2
} else {
class
}
}
/// The full egress class for a snapshot: information-content mapping with the
/// demotion floor overlaid. This is what the bridge stamps on the emitted
/// `FieldEvent`.
#[must_use]
pub fn egress_class(
ruview_class: RuViewPrivacyClass,
identity_bound: bool,
demoted: bool,
) -> PrivacyClass {
apply_demotion_floor(map_privacy(ruview_class, identity_bound), demoted)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn derived_maps_to_identity_tier_not_p1() {
// The single most dangerous mapping mistake: Derived (byte 1) must NOT
// become P1. It carries identity ⇒ P4, or P5 if identity-bound.
assert_eq!(map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived, false), PrivacyClass::P4);
assert_eq!(map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived, true), PrivacyClass::P5);
}
#[test]
fn full_table_matches_adr_262_section_3_3() {
assert_eq!(map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Raw, false), PrivacyClass::P0);
assert_eq!(map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived, false), PrivacyClass::P4);
assert_eq!(map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Anonymous, false), PrivacyClass::P2);
assert_eq!(map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Restricted, false), PrivacyClass::P2);
}
#[test]
fn mapping_ignores_non_monotonic_byte_value() {
// Derived's byte (1) is *below* Anonymous's byte (2), but Derived's
// mapped class must be *above* Anonymous's mapped class — proving the
// mapping uses information content, not the byte.
assert!(RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived.raw_byte() < RuViewPrivacyClass::Anonymous.raw_byte());
assert!(
map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived, false)
> map_privacy(RuViewPrivacyClass::Anonymous, false)
);
}
#[test]
fn demotion_floor_only_raises_privacy() {
// Raw → P0, but a demoted cycle floors to P2 with raw suppressed.
assert_eq!(apply_demotion_floor(PrivacyClass::P0, true), PrivacyClass::P2);
// Already-high classes are never lowered by the floor.
assert_eq!(apply_demotion_floor(PrivacyClass::P5, true), PrivacyClass::P5);
// No demotion ⇒ unchanged.
assert_eq!(apply_demotion_floor(PrivacyClass::P0, false), PrivacyClass::P0);
}
#[test]
fn identity_bound_only_promotes() {
// identity_bound never lowers privacy; it only promotes Derived P4→P5.
for c in [
RuViewPrivacyClass::Raw,
RuViewPrivacyClass::Derived,
RuViewPrivacyClass::Anonymous,
RuViewPrivacyClass::Restricted,
] {
assert!(map_privacy(c, true) >= map_privacy(c, false));
}
}
}