mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView
synced 2026-06-25 12:53:19 +00:00
Claude
d925538773
Makes the presence/person-count "beyond SOTA" claim falsifiable in code instead of aspirational (the unfalsifiability gap from the beyond-SOTA system review). occupancy_bench grades predictions vs ground truth and gates a SOTA claim behind one claim_allowed invariant requiring ALL of: - DataProvenance::Measured — synthetic/mock data is scorable for regression but never claimable (anti-mock-contamination; the CLAUDE.md Kconfig-bug lesson made structural). - A leak-free EvalSplit — validate() refuses any split where a subject OR environment id appears in both train and test (subject leakage / per-environment overfitting). - n_test >= min_test_samples (small-N guard). - Presence F1 whose bootstrap-CI lower bound (deterministic seeded splitmix64) clears the threshold — not the point estimate. - Count MAE within threshold. The claim string is unreadable except through the gate (NO_CLAIM otherwise), same discipline as the ruview-gamma acceptance gate. What remains is data, not method: a frozen, SHA-pinned, subject/environment-disjoint measured replay set turns the claim into a passing/failing test. Lives in wifi-densepose-train (the eval bounded context, alongside ablation/ eval/metrics). 10 tests cover each refusal path; warning-clean under the crate's missing_docs lint. Workspace gate 2,914 passed / 0 failed. Doc 03 updated. https://claude.ai/code/session_01MjBucx95K4BuUxZi8NWwRH